Werewolf by Night (1972) #29

Werewolf by Night  29Werewolf by Night somehow manages to straddle being an utter debacle on every possible level while simultaneously being perfectly in sync. Writer Doug Moench and artist Don Perlin have reached simpatico like Moench gave in to Perlin’s art and just started describing it in the narrative instead of trying to make it fit the pre-existing story he had in mind. Only once does Moench slip—when Perlin thought they were making just eighteen Lissa Russell into an old woman.

Also, Perlin doesn’t draw the Haitian mystic lady as a Black woman, but instead as some vaguely—well, actually, vaguely European in a particularly problematic way too—white hag. But Moench’s dialogue is… well, he embraces doing his version of an old Haitian lady’s dialect. It’s cringy even for a comic from 1975.

But the silly main plot, which has Wolfman Jack fighting “weredemon” Lissa, it’s kind of great. It’s not good. Moench throws out a bunch of established continuity, like the werewolf knowing Lissa’s his sister, so her being even smellier as a weredemon would probably help. And the narration—Jack, fully narrating the werewolf fight he’s observing first-hand but, you know, not because he’s narrating the panel action—has this repeated dream device. Jack remembers all the times he and Lissa wrestled when they were kids, which doesn’t sound like the siblings at all. The one time Moench finds some real emotion, he ignores it, and the rest of the time, there’s some weird patriarchal shit going on too.

At least Jack doesn’t think about how he wishes she’d have married his forty-five-year-old bestie Buck Cowan instead of turning into a werewolf like him.

Oh, the demon thing… Old Scratch hisself cursed the Russell family with lycanthropy, so the weredemon should be the standard.

Doesn’t matter. Something about the way Moench writes that narration of Perlin’s mostly bad but still somehow vibrant and active panels just works. Maybe Moench’s dismissal of canon? Though Jack being a shitty misogynist about psychic ex-love interest Topaz (he doesn’t dig her now she’s not as mystically powerful because he’s a twerp) sucks.

It might just be symbiosis—and Lissa’s extremely long birthday subplot having such a bullshit conclusion—but I do wonder if the book’s finally found the formula.

It’s a successful comic—you get your two bits worth—but it’s not a good one.

Maybe Moench just paced it well. It’s definitely not worth going back to figure out its (almost infinitely asterisked) success.

Tomb of Dracula (1972) #32

Tomb of Dracula  32Well. Writer Marv Wolfman reveals a lot this issue; it’s almost entirely nonsense, but there’s a lot of it. There are conclusions (of sorts) to Taj’s Indian sojourn and Frank Drake’s South American capitalist exploitation. Taj can’t stop the villagers from breaking in to kill his vampire son; Frank discovers he’s surrounded by worker zombies who move to kill him after he says hello to one of them. Not sure what they’d have done if he had ignored them.

It’s all part of Dracula’s plan, which includes something for Rachel, too—teased in an editor’s note but not revealed until the cliffhanger. He’s spent a dozen issues maneuvering nemesis Quincy Harker’s friends away, and now it’s time to strike. Despite Wolfman dragging out these subplots for ages, they make almost no sense, given Dracula’s plots over the same issues. He’s going to Harker’s now because Harker has a file about how Dracula is losing his powers. Like a white paper. Dracula apparently knows he’s losing strength, but not why, nor does he know the author of the white paper.

So Dracula had been isolating Harker—though, not really because Frank Drake’s just a shitty white guy who abandoned the vampire hunters—just in case he had need to call on him for a MacGuffin. Harker’s finally got the MacGuffin handy.

In the ensuing “battle, “ Dracula runs afoul of all Harker’s traps in the house. Or if he doesn’t get caught in one, Harker shows it to Drac to humble brag. All the while, Harker narrates in the present tense—presumably his internal monologue—and it’s awful. There’s this gorgeous Gene Colan and Tom Palmer art and this terrible narration from Wolfman. So much terrible narration.

But the narration isn’t the only problem: we’ve already seen Dracula in a trap house before. Maybe not this exact one, but he’s done a haunted house, he’s done a trap skyscraper… put them together, and it appears Dracula hasn’t learned shit over thirty issues; good thing for Harker.

We also learn why Harker wears dark sunglasses all the time. It’s a strange detail, revealing Dracula hasn’t just been incompetent since waking up in Tomb #1.

The cliffhanger promises we’ll get more resolution next issue, but I’m not sure I believe Wolfman.

Werewolf by Night (1972) #28

Wbn28I’ve been wondering why Werewolf never does an issue in-between Jack’s werewolf nights—so, you know, the majority of his life—and Doug Moench “delivers” here, complete with entirely unsuitable hard-boiled narration for surfer bro Jack. After last issue’s second-night cliffhanger, they all had an uneventful third night. Then they didn’t talk for a week, just moped around, presumably because neither Jack nor Buck wanted to console Topaz, whose soul is in peril.

But then Lissa shows up just before her birthday. And then Dr. Glitternight comes back to threaten Topaz; she’s got two weeks to deliver her father, even though he died back in issue #14 or something. Two weeks is also how long Lissa has before she too becomes a werewolf. Moench vaguely touches on their curse being something to do with Dad being a warlock (at one point, Satan hisself had damned the Russell family to Larry Talboting for eternity).

So they all decide to head out to the family island, where they can turn into werewolves in peace, something no one’s thought of doing in twenty-nine issues of the comic. For a brief moment, it seems like artist Don Perlin might be able to do the “dark and stormy night” castle stuff.

He cannot. I’ve been going soft on Perlin as of late, complimenting his thumbnail long shots, which I’d have been proud to draw as a tween. But, holy shit, his art is terrible this issue. So bad editor Len Wein should’ve apologized.

The castle and its reveals end up being even worse than the lousy soap opera first half of the comic. Perlin’s got lots to draw, and he’s terrible at all of it. Well, the thumbnails, I guess. But the rest? Atrocious.

And sister Lissa’s much-ballyhooed eighteenth birthday? Eh. The werewolf transformation isn’t a cop-out, but the utter lack of character development disappoints. The comic’s been promising this occasion since the first issue or maybe even Marvel Spotlight. Moench whiffs it.

Nowhere near as bad as the art, but still. He’s had the time to plot it, and he didn’t.

Werewolf barely reads like a professional comic; everything comes off silly and amateurish. This poor book. Curse of the Werewolf, indeed.

Tomb of Dracula (1972) #31

Tomb of Dracula  31The “Taj in India” C plot has been running seven issues, so half a year, and it’s just now getting to him staking his vampire son. The cover shows Taj thrilled to do it and the wife begging him to stop; the interior’s the opposite; the entire point of Taj going home was to stake the kid before the villagers do it. And to slap his wife around for being… a woman, basically.

Anyway.

Writer Marv Wolfman and penciller Gene Colan cover the Taj C plot simultaneously with the Frank Drake C plot. Frank’s down in South America working for his shitty white guy pal and not noticing all the workers seem to be literal zombies. Neither subplot gets any resolution (and Frank’s doesn’t even get a real cliffhanger), but maybe next time, we’ll finally get some movement on the Taj story. I mean, we won’t, but still. I’ll pretend.

Then we get a half page of Rachel Van Helsing (once the series lead) moping around with an ominous, text-only cliffhanger. Great art from Colan and inker Tom Palmer, but it’s the laziest check-in Tomb could do.

The actual A plot involves Inspector Chelm finally getting the upper hand in his hunt for Dracula. The issue opens with Drac killing a member of Parliament’s daughter (a week after killing the wife), assuming such loss will inspire the guy to vote for “The Master.” It’s unclear the guy doesn’t know “The Master” is Dracula, but there’s also a conspiracy group subplot (almost entirely in expository dialogue) and then a qualified reveal of Dracula’s great scheme.

Qualified because Wolfman reveals the good guys know there’s a great scheme, and they reveal to Dracula they know it, but the reader doesn’t find out. If it goes at Taj pace… it’ll only be four issues before we hear about it again.

Wolfman does a neat little “mixed media” thing with a newspaper report about the Parliament member’s daughter’s death.

Quincy Harker making his own speakerphone, so he doesn’t have to hold the receiver because he’s too busy reading papers, is less neat and makes it hard to sympathize with the heroes. Sure, they’re not trying to take over the world and kill everyone, but Dracula’s not out there making Rube Goldberg speakerphones either.

Gorgeous art from Colan and Palmer, some of their best even: it’s a police conspiracy thriller guest-starring Dracula, and they make it happen.

Werewolf by Night (1972) #27

Wbn27There are numerous things to talk about this issue, but the teaser for next issue muscles them all out. Next issue is Lissa’s eighteenth birthday, an event the series has been promising for twenty issues and three years. I’m not taking the teaser as a promise, especially when writer Doug Moench is so comfortable retconning.

The biggest official retcon is Jack remembering Wolfman Jack’s adventures. It’s always been a problem for the book, which has Jack narrating his werewolf outings, only then clarifying later he doesn’t remember what goes on when he’s the werewolf. So how’s he narrating? Moench just does away with it, which is fine. I think in the early issues, they hinted at it being like a nightmare state. Whatever.

Moench might also move Buck Cowan’s house, or it could just be artist Don Perlin not doing much detail in his establishing shots. Perlin will be a thing to talk about, but first… Moench’s narration for Jack. He’s very intentionally writing it as a hard-boiled homage because nothing says hard-boiled like a blond-haired, blue-eyed surfer bro who’s Eastern European royalty and has a moneybags stepfather (slash uncle). I mean, maybe Jack does spend his non-werewolf times watching old Bogart and Brando movies and rocking out to the Stones—Jack ain’t no hippie, y’all—it’s not impossible since we never, ever see Jack do anything but werewolf out. But, also, no. Sure, Jan.

The story this issue involves the werewolf stumbling across an old nemesis of Topaz’s from India. Topaz forgot to tell anyone in getting back her “esper” powers (never called them esper powers before); she had to give her evil, womanly sinful side of her soul to the bad guy, Dr. Clitterhouse. Dr. Glitternight. Whatever.

The issue’s silly but okay, with Perlin leaning in on the long shots for action. He’s better at those. He’s also not bad at the slimy monsters. Wolfman Jack? Not great; slimy, tentacle monster, all good.

Tomb of Dracula (1972) #30

Tod30I love how writer Marv Wolfman makes sure Dracula’s racist towards Blade to in-virtue signal, except van Helsing and his daughter were racist towards Blade too. And hero Frank Drake is constantly racist towards Taj. It’s an unfortunate trivia note to an otherwise solid fill-in issue. Or at least, the Tomb of Dracula version of a fill-in. It’s the same team; it’s just nothing to do with the main story.

Instead, it’s a series of flashbacks as Dracula works on his diaries. He’s just buried Shiela and is standing over her grave, working through some mental gymnastics to escape any blame for the situation. He told her he was Count Dracula, Lord of the Undead, didn’t he? Maybe if she’d listened to him, she wouldn’t be dead now.

Joking aside, it’s… character development. Wolfman’s in a pickle with character development on Dracula because any character development will make him sympathetic at this point, and Wolfman wants to keep him a villain. Hell, Dracula wants to stay a villain—he’s rambling about people expecting something different from him.

He’s got three different journal entries for the evening, with Blade showing in the final one; it’s a recounting of their first encounter.

The first flashback is about a Prussian politician’s wife convincing Dracula to kill her husband. While Dracula’s narration complains about her being a bother, he still agrees to do the deed. Only he’s in for a surprise once he gets there. I think Wolfman must’ve been reading some World War I history based on the cameos.

Great art on it from Gene Colan and Tom Palmer makes up for a lot. The story peaks early when Dracula’s thinking about how the wife is pretending his rotten flesh doesn’t stink when he usually has to hypnotize the ladies into not smelling it.

What?

Major detail. Should’ve been in issue five or something. It’s issue thirty.

The next flashback is about Dracula getting involved in a family squabble where the dad doesn’t want to pay for his daughter to go to blind school anymore because he’s a selfish prick. Meanwhile, the daughter asks Dracula to play dolls with her. Great art, somewhat oddly paced story, decent finish. However, Dracula’s inability to understand complex grief and panic ring false.

The Blade story’s the last one. It takes place in 1968, so pretty soon before Tomb starts (the series, at least its start time, is rather well-established for a comic). Dracula’s holding court in China, and Blade wants to talk to him. Cue some racism.

It’s the action story, the one where they can put Blade on the cover to promise an appearance while really delivering a glorified cameo. Despite being their first meeting, Blade doesn’t need to be Blade for the story to work. It’d be better if it weren’t him. And not just because it’d (presumably) cut out racist Dracula.

Still, excellent art, of course, because Colan and Palmer aren’t going to deliver anything else.

The issue starts much better than it finishes, and, despite whatever he’s doing with the racism bit, Wolfman’s tentative character development for the Count is something new in the book and something good.

Giant-Size Werewolf (1974) #3

Gsw3Giant-Size Werewolf #3 might be artist Don Perlin’s best… oh, wait. He just penciled. Sal Trapani inked. Perlin was penciling and inking over in regular Werewolf by Night at this point. Okay, never mind. I mean, it’s okay art—especially for Perlin—but it’s nowhere near as impressive with someone else helping out. Especially since my biggest compliment was Perlin doing a nod to Mike Ploog’s Topaz every sixth panel. The other five panels aren’t good (people’s noses change shape, or their eyes move up and down on their heads between panels in the same scene). But there seems to be an attempt at a Ploog nod.

Maybe it’s coincidence.

But Perlin does better with the Eastern European Universal Monsters village setting than he ever does in L.A.

The Werewolf story is thirty pages, the bulk of the issue but not considerably longer than the reprint backups (four, five-page stories). The feature comes with the caveat the first chapter is a red herring to fill pages. Jack, as the werewolf, goes back to his family castle off the coast of Monterey. Writer Doug Moench goes overboard with his adjectives and adverbs here, including variations of Monterey. It’s a lot.

He (Jack) thinks Topaz is being held prisoner there; only once he completes the level, he finds out—rather anti-climatically—she’s actually being held in another castle. His family’s summer villa back in Transylvania. After a brief chat with step-father and uncle (I just realized Werewolf is Hamlet with a happier family situation), Jack and seventeen-year-old sister Lissa are off to the old country to find Topaz. Lissa wants to go because it might have to do with the Darkhold, and she’s been about to turn eighteen for three years and over two dozen comics. It could happen anytime. Birthdays are weird in the Marvel Universe.

They get to the airport and run into Jack’s best friend, forty-something Buck Cowan, who the comic goes out of its way to imply is way too touchy-feely with Lissa.

In Transylvania, they discover the villagers are angry at a traveling band of Romani people. The band is hanging out at Jack’s family castle; only when he gets there, they’re not. Worse, Topaz is being held somewhere else again! Only this time, Jack’s going to werewolf-out to rescue her.

The story’s got some twists and turns and silly werewolf fights, but Perlin and Trapani aren’t bad when the action’s in long shot. And even though Moench’s obnoxious writing of Jack’s inexplicable narration (past tense describing things Jack doesn’t remember), the actual dialogue’s okay. It’s nice to have Topaz back, all things considered.

It’s a much better Giant-Size Werewolf than I was expecting. Not good, but not a waste either.

The backups are similar in quality. They’re all early fifties Atlas reprints, mostly without writer credit.

George Roussos has art chores in the first story about a creeping, killer mist. It turns out to be an inter-dimensional thing, kind of like Lovecraft. It’s decent throughout, but the finish is blah.

The second story’s much better, though, with a similarly blah finish. Written by Carl Wessler, with art by Pete Tumlinson, it’s about a suicidal eighty-year-old who discovers a magic spot in the river. It doesn’t drown you; it sends you back in time. He keeps going back, getting richer and richer (thirty-five years before Back to the Future Part II revived the trope), only there are bad guys after him. With a better ending, it would’ve been something.

Still, engaging.

Then there’s an all-horror killer rat story; art by Manny Stallman. A random guy happens upon a man talking to rats, and the rats understand him. The rat-keeper is planning on having the rats kill the guy until the guy mentions a rich uncle. It’s fine. Cute rats.

The last story has inks by Abe Simon and pencils by none other than Don Perlin, twenty years before he did the feature. The guys at a newspaper send a female reporter out to cover a strangler case, even though it makes her a target, and she doesn’t want to go. Once she arrives in the town, she immediately finds herself trapped by the stranger. Or does she?

It’s okay. The reveal’s logic is fine; it’s just too rushed.

All in all, a solid Giant-Size. Well worth the four bits.

Tomb of Dracula (1972) #29

Tomb of Dracula  29I can’t believe how well writer Marv Wolfman ends up doing with this issue. It very much should not work, yet it ends up working (in no small part due to Gene Colan and Tom Palmer’s superb artwork; it’s one of their best issues). But the story… wow wee. Dracula starts the issue attacking a random babysitter, and after the splash page, Colan goes with the vampire bat attacking from above, which was a visual trope for the first few issues of Tomb. Colan dropped it almost noticeably, and it’s only one panel here; not as much terrifying the victims, I guess.

See, Dracula’s upset because he got dumped. Familiar Shiela left him for Yeshiva student David and so Dracula’s rampaging. He goes to bed, planning to kill David the next night. Luckily, since Shiela’s so upset about Dracula, David goes to kill him. Even though Shiela and David can’t be more than friends—“right or wrong,” their differing religions get in the way—he wants her to feel safe, so he’s going to succeed where everyone else has failed.

Sure.

Wolfman’s second-person narration mainly just lectures Dracula about being such a son of a bitch (Boris Karloff should’ve done readings of this narration, a la The Grinch). It’s not great and initially seems like it’s going to do the issue in. It does not, however, because Dracula’s actions—separate from the close second-person—reveal a much more complicated character arc. I’m sure Wolfman didn’t intend for the narration and the narrative to work against each other, but it’s a success.

Less successful—though very weird by the end—is Taj’s origin story. Dracula attacked Taj, his son, and his wife. The wife ran and got her legs crushed, a vampire bit the kid, and Rachel Van Helsing showed up in the nick of time to save Taj from Dracula. The wife narrates the origin and tries to trick… well, the reader, but apparently also Taj. It doesn’t matter because even though he’s been shitty to her—presumably okay because she ran out on him during the attack—they get busy in a very sexy scene from Colan and Palmer. Looks like a romance cover.

The resolution to the main plot’s a little abrupt, but the rawness helps with the emotion. It’s a rather good issue.

Werewolf by Night (1972) #26

Wbn26

Artist Don Perlin keeps himself busy this issue. Each page has at least seven panels, usually with Perlin doing the action in small, vertical panels, in long-shot. As detail isn’t Perlin’s strong suit, the composition choices help.

I have to be honest and admit I dug this issue so much I’m worried about myself. There’s nothing good or interesting about it, but it’s a monster comic set in the Marvel Universe. We get a three-way fight between Wolfman Jack, the Hangman (who Doug Moench writes better than Marv Wolfman, who created the character back in Werewolf #11), and the seventies Mr. Hyde.

Mr. Hyde’s got a ridiculous name—DePrayve (but better than George Lucas’s prequel proper nouns)—but it doesn’t matter. Werewolf has a relatively low bar to clear, though Moench seems again committed to changing things up. The last time he changed things up, Moench made the comic closer to its ground situation back in the first few issues. Moved Jack in with Buck again, reintroduced Lissa’s frequently forgotten impending werewolf curse, and brought in another dipshit cop. The last dipshit cop was dirty. This dipshit cop doesn’t know the last one was bad news, so has it out for… well, Jack, I guess. Wolfman Jack.

Moench writes a peculiar comic, from the Hangman’s (restrained but well-focused) rants and then Jack’s narration. It’s still forgotten experience—Jack doesn’t remember the werewolf’s adventures, even though he narrates them in the comic—but Moench ignores the discrepancies better.

The less you think about Werewolf by Night, reading it or writing it, the better.

It’s a godawful issue for Jack’s pal, Buck, not just because Perlin can’t draw him the same in any two panels.

Otherwise, no guest stars. No step-dads, no sisters, just Hangman terrorizing the werewolf. It’s better than it ought to be.

Tomb of Dracula (1972) #28

Tomb of Dracula  28

Writer Marv Wolfman starts this issue with a….

Okay, here’s a welcome to the future moment. Wolfman starts the issue with a quote about a Hindu king, making me think this issue was the third in his “religion” trilogy of issues (beginning with the Jewish issue, then a generally religious one) with Hinduism. But not only doesn’t Wolfman return to it—he’s just doing it to South Asia up Taj’s brief appearance, which reveals what I remember it revealing—it’s not even from a Hindu text. It’s from A Man and a Woman, an 1892 novel by one Stanley Waterloo, an American newspaperman turned novelist. Despite being a hit in the 1890s, Waterloo didn’t maintain popularity long enough for anyone to turn his works into movies.

He apparently made it into a book of quotes unless Wolfman was really into willfully forgotten pop literature.

Anyway.

After Taj’s scene, which has his wife taking him to see their vampire son, who the villagers have decided—out of fear but no inciting incident—should die. The villagers had been donating their blood for years to keep the kid “alive,” but not anymore. He’s got to go. It’s a well-illustrated scene but dramatically inert. Wolfman’s narration when Taj is protagonist is at best condescending and often worse.

The main story is Dracula, familiar Shiela, and her new de facto beau, David, fighting an unrevealed villain for control of the Chimera statue. No more spoilers than the following, but the Chimera statue is basically like if the Infinity Gauntlet were made out of toothpicks glued together. It can conquer the universe, but it’s really, really, really delicate.

The villain gives the leads hallucinations, good and bad, so Shiela dreams of Dracula loving her as a woman. David’s scared his dead dad was actually an atheist and thought his son going to Yeshiva was stupid. Dracula has a fight scene with the vampire hunters. Dracula’s hallucination ends with daughter Lilith delivering the fatal blow as she’s the one he fears the most. I wonder if that detail will come back.

The ending suggests the series is undergoing another change in supporting cast, which is peculiar for several reasons.

There’s excellent art from Gene Colan and Tom Palmer, and some of Wolfman’s character development is, if not successful, at least engaging. But there are definitely causes for concern. The series has been in a kind of limbo for a half dozen issues, and Wolfman’s just heading in deeper.