Dracula (1979, John Badham)

This Dracula adaptation takes place in 1913, which is only important so leading lady Kate Nelligan (battling and sometimes winning her English accent) can be a suffragette, and her beau, Trevor Eve, can drive a motorcar. So there can be a car chase. Or three.

The film begins already in England. A ship is having trouble at sea; the crew is trying to get a wooden crate overboard, but theyโ€™re too late, and a wolf attacks them. On land, Nelligan lives with her father, Donald Pleasence, who runs a mental institution. Her sickly friend Jan Francis is staying with them. Nelligan helps out in the institution, where the patients arenโ€™t so much violent as profoundly tragic.

After the boat crashes, Francis goes down to the shore and discovers a lone survivor and apparently the shipโ€™s only passenger, a Transylvanian count. We donโ€™t get to see him for a while; Dracula, down to the John Williams score, is a late seventies studio blockbuster. The height of pre-ILM special effects, many smartly executed composite shots, exquisite matte paintings, and Superman: The Movie moments. Down to Laurence Olivierโ€™s stunt cast as Van Helsing, who isnโ€™t a vampire hunter, just a grieving father. Francis is his daughter, and sheโ€™s not long for the world. Or movie.

The filmโ€™s first hour is moving the pieces around so Langella and Nelligan can have a romance. They need to overcome hurdles, like her presumed engagement to Eve (apparently, they both were just fooling around) and Langellaโ€™s desire to create a vampire army to destroy the humans. Starting with Francis.

But since Nelligan disappears in the second half of the filmโ€”sheโ€™s the vampireโ€™s victim, the fair maiden the men must protectโ€”the film loses its romance angle. Langella hangs out to menace the good guys, but he also vanishes for a stretch. The third act misses them, particularly Nelligan, who never gets to sit with her burgeoning vampiric attributes.

Instead, itโ€™s all about Olivier, Pleasence, and Eve teaming up, though in stages. Olivier and Pleasence get one set piece, then Olivier gets another, then Eve finally gets to team up for the car chases. Despite the good guy plot being Olivierโ€™s movie, he makes room for his costars. He and Pleasence have a delightful rapport; before Olivier arrives to check on Francis, Pleasence is an absent-minded dad-type. He relies on Nelligan for a lot of the institution work, and heโ€™s settled into fine country living when heโ€™s off the clock. He doesnโ€™t even remember how to help someone choking; itโ€™s been so long since heโ€™s practiced real medicine.

When Olivier arrives, Pleasence becomes his Watson. At least until the third act, when thereโ€™s not enough room for Pleasence anymore.

Director Badham is often ostentatious; despite the English shooting locations, Draculaโ€™s very Americanโ€”just listen to Langellaโ€™s accent (or lack thereof). Or, really, Nelliganโ€™s English one. Olivier does a heavy accent, which is fine; his performance just doesnโ€™t have any nuance. He doesnโ€™t need it, I suppose. Francisโ€™s accentโ€™s terrible, though. It always sounds like sheโ€™s mumbling.

The film wraps up with a conflicted statement about Nelliganโ€™s agency under the patriarchyโ€”Langellaโ€™s offering her real power; she just has to eat peopleโ€”but itโ€™s a reasonably successful adaptation. Langellaโ€™s mesmerizing as a dashing Dracula, and he and Nelliganโ€™s chemistry is good. Pleasence and Olivier are fun. Eveโ€™s fine. Tony Haygarthโ€™s a relatively harmless but still terrifying Renfield.

Lovely photography from Gilbert Taylor and good editing from John Bloom. The Williams score is just okay; he doesnโ€™t have a good โ€œDracula theme,โ€ which he needs.

Great costumes from Julie Harris and production design from Peter Murton. Draculaโ€™s often sumptuous. Itโ€™s a little slow, but itโ€™s all right.


Posted in , , , , ,

10 responses to “Dracula (1979, John Badham)”

  1. Realweegiemidget Reviews Avatar

    OOH, this does sound a fantastic cast and John Williams.. not seen this but now must. Thanks for bringing this to our blogathon! Just added to my to find and watch list.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      Excellent! It’s one of those weird forgotten big movies. Definitely worth seeking out. ๐Ÿฆ‡

      1. Realweegiemidget Reviews Avatar

        Certainly am, after reading about this fab cast and your great review.

  2. Christopher Cooper Avatar
    Christopher Cooper

    Very interesting adaptation of the stage play revival that made Frank Langella a star. And he has been one ever since. I agree that Olivier is stunt casting–and would have LOVED to see Donald Pleasance play Van Helsing here.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      Agreed. I just watched HALLOWEEN the other day and I don’t think Van Helsing and Loomis would’ve been too similar and a non-dashing Van Helsing would’ve been interesting.

  3. Brian Schuck Avatar
    Brian Schuck

    I’ve only seen this version once – like you, I’m sort of blah on it. It’s been so long, I had completely forgotten that Pleasence is in it! Even with my hazy memory, I think you’re spot on that he would have made a much better Van Helsing. Sir Larry could overact outrageously some times. From your description of some of the liberties they took (which, again, I had largely forgotten), it comes off as somewhat of a mess. Also, I think it tips a bit too far into romance territory, like the musical version of The Phantom of the Opera, but I know there are folks who absolutely love this version.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      I have an interesting history with it in that I’m 99.9% sure I saw the full-color VHS before Badham desaturated it and liked it (as a kid). Then saw it again desaturated and didn’t (as less of a kid), then this time and am now in between. I suppose technically it’s one of my favorite DRACULA movies though.

  4. Hamlette (Rachel) Avatar

    I forgot Donald Pleasance is in this! I mostly remember Langella and Olivier — as you say, it’s basically their movie, really. And I don’t complain.

  5. Michael Avatar
    Michael

    Very interesting. I’ve never seen this version of Dracula mainly because I’m a fan of Lugosi’s and Lee’s takes on the character and wasn’t sure there was room in my mind for another. After reading your review, I’m still kind of on the fence. It sounds like Pleasence’s performance is fun but the plot seems a bit unfocused.

  6. rebeccadeniston Avatar

    I’ve never been too eager to see this version of “Dracula” because it looks as if they’ve taken some odd liberties, but now I’m intrigued. It looks just bad enough. ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.