Bigger Than Life (1956, Nicholas Ray)

Despite producing the film himself, top-billed James Mason doesnโ€™t have the best part in Bigger Than Life. Instead, Barbara Rushโ€“as his suffering wifeโ€“gets it. Masonโ€™s a man with a life threatening chronic illness who has to take special medication. Slowlyโ€“though not too slowlyโ€“that medication starts making him psychotic. Rush is the faithful wife who ignores advice and sticks by Masonโ€™s side, even before she finds out itโ€™s an increasingly known side effect of the medication. After she does make that discovery, itโ€™s basically a rush to the finish with the danger being how far is Mason going to go.

And, actually, he doesnโ€™t go anywhere near as far as one might assume. Thereโ€™s a bit of restraint, because the movie never wants to make Mason too much the villain. He can be psychologically abusive to son Christopher Olsen, but it takes Olsen a really long time to break down and tell mom Rush how he hates Msaon now. And even after family friend Walter Matthau counsels Rush to call Masonโ€™s doctorโ€“little does she know Masonโ€™s actively deceiving doctor (Robert F. Simon) and has been since his first night home from the hospital. The screenplayโ€“credited to Cyril Hume and Richard Maibaum, but with some uncredited helpโ€“gives Rush a range of fantastic scenes as she copes with Masonโ€™s awful behavior, without ever really giving her a great role. Sheโ€™s just dutiful wife. Of course sheโ€™s going to stand by her man, why wouldnโ€™t she?

Though I suppose Masonโ€™s lack of actual dangerous outbursts, just psychological torture of his family, do play a part. Though itโ€™s not like Rush gets to react to them after the fact. She doesnโ€™t get much in the way of character development. No one does. Not even Matthau, whoโ€™s third-billed but an overblown cameo by the second half. In the first act, heโ€™s Masonโ€™s best palโ€“Masonโ€™s a school teacher, Matthauโ€™s the gym teacherโ€“and essential support to the family. Once Masonโ€™s out of the hospital, the film forgets about him until they need an exposition dump. Heโ€™s the one who tells Rush about the drugโ€™s side effects, as well as informs on Mason after Mason loses it at a school open house.

The scene where Mason faces repercussions for the behavior at the open house is entirely missing, as principal Rusty Laneโ€“another pal of Masonโ€™s early onโ€“fades away. The more the story focuses in on just Mason, Rush, and Olsen the more unreasonable the plotting becomes. Director Ray is able to get some real tension in the third act, but itโ€™s almost out of nowhere. The family goes to church, which sets Mason off in unexpected ways. Not at church, however, once theyโ€™re home, which makes Masonโ€™s earlier public out burst a little nonsensical. His behaviorโ€™s predictable to some degreeโ€“heโ€™s abusive at homeโ€“but only because home is the only place where the action takes place. Presumably heโ€™s still going to work, but there are no further scenes there after a point, which makes the film more and more Rushโ€™s, which is fine. Sheโ€™s great. But the narrativeโ€™s lacking.

Bigger Than Life does only run ninety-five minutes, however, so thereโ€™s only so much it can do. Kipp Hamilton, as one of Mason and Matthauโ€™s coworkers (who Rush suspects is having an affair with Mason at one point), completely disappears after Masonโ€™s first day out of the hospital. Sheโ€™s there long enough to stir up some masculine pride in his wifeโ€™s figure (Hamilton is a snazzier dresser than Rush) so Mason decides to bankrupt the family to get Rush a fancy dress. See, the erratic behavior starts right away, when theoretically Mason is taking his prescribed doseโ€ฆ his abuse gets worse as the film goes along, increasing as his mental problems increase, but thereโ€™s no direct narrative connection between the two threads. Theyโ€™re parallel, understood to be causal, but unexplored.

Instead Mason just gets on this kick where heโ€™s going to save the world from the stupid kids of modernity through a return to classical teaching. Itโ€™s not explored much more than that description. The script avoids a lot.

But until the third act, the movie basically holds it all together. Itโ€™s not until Rush has a last minute monologue explaining herself, which doesnโ€™t actually explain any of her behavior on screenโ€“the dialogue doesnโ€™t jibe with her performance to this pointโ€“it seems like no one really knows how to end the movie. Then the movie sets a goal for how it can succeed andโ€ฆ doesnโ€™t. What should be a great acting opportunity for Mason turns into some schmaltz. Not even enthusiastic schmaltz, much lses sincere.

Thereโ€™s great photography from Joseph MacDonald, good direction from Rayโ€“who has that wide Cinemascope frame but still manages to confine his actors in it, particularly in the tense home scenes, which are the filmโ€™s main type of sceneโ€“and some fine production values. Ray doesnโ€™t have quite the handle on the school scenes, particularly not as far as tension goes, but theyโ€™re pretty sparse once things get going. One of the best sequences, Mason and Olsen playing football and Mason getting progressively more abusive, seems like itโ€™s out of another film entirely, Rayโ€™s style is so different and MacDonald shooting exteriors is such a visual shift.

The film acknowledges quite a bit about toxic masculinity, though nowhere near all the toxic masculinity it ends up visualizingโ€“and Rushโ€™s eventual capitulation to itโ€“which makes things interesting. Itโ€™s another of the filmโ€™s little disappointments. The hasty finish keeps everyone aware from any self-examination.

Besides the great performances from Rush and Mason, Olsenโ€™s good as the kid, Matthauโ€™s likable in his part, Simonโ€™s good as the doctor. If Ray gave the entire film as much subtlety as the doctors standing around silently regarding Mason, well, itโ€™d be a much different picture. Though, given the way the script works, maybe not a better one. Itโ€™s just a bunch of different style choices in a relatively short amount of time. Even the finale is a style choice. Rayโ€™s great at implementing those styles, just not at making them matter.

Bigger Than Life is pretty good, but cast and crew deserve more.


Posted in , , , , ,

10 responses to “Bigger Than Life (1956, Nicholas Ray)”

  1. palewriter2 Avatar

    Really enjoyed reading this. Mason seems perfect to play a totally unhinged part, it’s a pity that the film doesn’t make full use of that.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      Thanks ๐Ÿ™‚ Yeah, I kept waiting for Mason to explode but they can’t figure out how to commit to it.

  2. Patricia Nolan-Hall (@CaftanWoman) Avatar

    it sounds like an interesting topic for the era. I can’t recall many pictures questioning the actions of the medical community. You also make it sound as if they couldn’t decide to focus on the practical or the psyche, and how to best meld the two.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      It’s definitely treading new ground… just very awkwardly.

  3. Silver Screenings Avatar

    This sounds worth a look, even if it is a bit uneven. I’m a sucker for James Mason in ANY film.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      Yeah, it’s never bad to see a James Mason movie at least once.

  4. maddylovesherclassicfilms Avatar
    maddylovesherclassicfilms

    It was quite a brave film for the time showing us the dangers of prescribed medication. James Mason delivers a powerful performance. I go from liking him, to loathing him, to pitying him as the film goes on. Thanks for joining me to celebrate James.

    1. Andrew Wickliffe Avatar

      Thanks for hosting! Love the James Mason ๐Ÿ™‚

      1. maddylovesherclassicfilms Avatar
        maddylovesherclassicfilms

        My pleasure. Glad you had a good time taking part. He was the best!

  5. silverscreenclassicsblog Avatar

    A film ahead of its’ time and Mason is perfect for the role. Such a great talent in a penultimate performance. Thanks for a great article! Best regards, Paul

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.